Executive agreements are becoming increasingly popular in the world of international relations and diplomacy. As opposed to formal treaties, executive agreements are used as a means for countries to make agreements and resolve conflicts more quickly and efficiently. There are several reasons why executive agreements are attractive and increasingly being used more than formal treaties, as evidenced by websites, like Quizlet.
Firstly, executive agreements are a faster and more flexible way of making agreements. Unlike formal treaties, which require a lengthy process of drafting, approval, and ratification, executive agreements can be reached much more quickly. This is especially attractive when it comes to resolving urgent or time-sensitive issues that require immediate action. For example, in the context of international trade, executive agreements can be used to address issues such as tariffs, quotas, and subsidies more efficiently than formal treaties.
Secondly, executive agreements are more confidential, which is another reason they are attractive. Unlike formal treaties, which are subject to public scrutiny and must be approved by the U.S. Senate, executive agreements can be kept secret. This is particularly useful in cases where a country wants to avoid the political challenges that come with having to explain the agreement to its citizens.
Thirdly, executive agreements are more flexible and adaptable than formal treaties. These agreements can be adjusted and amended much more easily than treaties, which can take years to renegotiate. This makes executive agreements an attractive option for countries that need to respond quickly to changing circumstances. For instance, executive agreements can be used to modify existing treaties to accommodate changes in political or economic circumstances.
Fourthly, executive agreements are less contentious than formal treaties. When a country signs a formal treaty, there is a risk that it will be seen as taking sides or forming an alliance with the other party. In contrast, executive agreements are less formal and more collaborative, which makes them less likely to be perceived as partisan. This can be especially valuable in situations where multiple parties are involved.
Finally, executive agreements can be used as a means of avoiding domestic political obstacles. Since executive agreements do not require Senate approval, they can be used to circumvent domestic political opposition. This makes them an attractive option for countries that want to avoid political risks associated with formal treaties.
In conclusion, executive agreements are becoming increasingly popular as a tool for resolving international issues. They are faster, more confidential, flexible, and adaptable than formal treaties, making them an attractive option for countries that need to respond quickly to changing circumstances or avoid political risks associated with formal treaties. As a copy editor, it is important to understand the benefits and drawbacks of different forms of international agreements, and to communicate these nuances effectively in your writing.